Tag: Roger Olson

  • Top 10 Theology Books That Have Impacted My Life

    Top 10 Theology Books That Have Impacted My Life

    It’s now been over two weeks since we’ve been sheltering at home. I’ve posted every day for 14 days. After all the research I did for yesterday’s post, I’m feeling a little brain-dead today. So here’s something on the lighter side. It’s Friday, after all.

    Without too much commentary, here are the top ten books that I would say have had the biggest impact on me when it comes to my theological perspective. Some of these brought about massive paradigm shifts as a result of reading them. Some have affected the course of my life in pivotal seasons. Their place here does not imply that I agree with every idea proposed in all of them, but that does not diminish the importance they’ve had in my journey.

    1. Mere Christianity by C. S. Lewis — The one that jump-started my journey as a theologian, and a constant reminder of the beauty of the core doctrines all Christians can agree on, even amidst the great diversity in the church.
    2. The Reason for God by Tim Keller — The cogent arguments in this book helped save my faith in a season of intense doubt (read more about that here).
    3. The Grace Awakening by Charles Swindoll — God used this book to remind me how radical his grace toward me really is, and it opened my eyes to how badly I needed to learn to have grace with myself, too.
    4. Living by the Book by Howard G. Hendricks & William Hendricks — My introduction to the basics of biblical exegesis back when I was a total noob in college. Everybody’s gotta start somewhere.
    5. Against Calvinism by Roger Olson — Helped me put my finger on the philosophical problems my previously-held Calvinistic framework never could quite explain and that I always felt terribly uneasy about.
    6. Following the Master: A Biblical Theology of Discipleship by Michael J. Wilkins — Honed my abiding passion for discipleship into what eventually became a course I now teach annually for college interns.
    7. Justification by N. T. Wright, and Salvation by Allegiance Alone by Matthew Bates — Putting these together as a tie for #7 since I read them back-to-back and since both helped me get more comfortable swimming in the massive pool that is the New Perspectives on Paul movement. Also, both these books helped me articulate a fuller definition of “faith” that’s more accurate to what the NT envisions.
    8. Five Views on Biblical Inerrancy edited by J. Merrick & Stephen M. Garrett — Phew, boy! This one forced me to reexamine all of my presuppositions about how the Bible works and how it’s meant to be read. I’d say my faith in Scripture’s truthfulness and authority is stronger (but also more nuanced) than ever thanks to reading it.
    9. Inspiration and Incarnation by Peter Enns — Similar to the one above. After deconstructing my initial doctrine of Scripture, this particular book by Enns was helpful for reconstruction, and I’ve since adopted the “progressive or genre-based inerrancy” approach he articulates.
    10. Reading Revelation Responsibly by Michael J. Gorman, and Revelation: Anchor Yale Bible Commentary by Craig R. Koester — I list these two together as a tie because I read them back-to-back in a season when I was reexamining my entire approach to eschatology (last things) and the book of Revelation. Gorman’s provocative book put the nail in the coffin of my previous “Left Behind” dispensationalist approach, while Koester’s excellent commentary opened my eyes to the literary, historical, and theological beauty of Revelation when the fearmongering of American end-times culture is, pardon the pun, left behind.

    And those are the top ten theology books that have influenced me. At least, the ones whose influence I can most clearly bring to mind; others have no doubt left more indelible marks.

    What books have most changed your life or your thinking? Let me know in the comments.

    See you down the path.

  • Biblical Studies Carnival #166: November 2019

    Biblical Studies Carnival #166: November 2019

    In a first for this site, I’ve had the privilege of being invited to host this month’s Biblical Studies Carnival! These carnivals are a long-running tradition in the world of academic biblical studies blogging, and I greatly enjoyed putting this together. A “carnival” is basically a roundup of new posts and publications from the previous month. It helps give exposure to some good scholarship or thought-provoking writing that people might otherwise have missed.

    Without further ado, here’s what I found to be well worth reading in November:


    Hebrew Bible / Old Testament Studies

    The folks behind Logos Bible Software put out this great reflection on the theme of exile in the Pentateuch on their blog.

    Brandon D. Smith weighs in on the historical Adam debate. I’m sure he and I would quibble on some of the details, but I largely agree with his conclusion about how we should preach and teach Genesis 1-3.

    At the Conciliar Post, Wesley Walker offers a beautiful reflection on two Old Testament passages where we see the self-emptying tendency of God that eventually finds full display on the cross: “Revelatory Crucicentricity: 1 Samuel 16 and 1 Kings 19 as Kenotic Patterns.”

    James Bradford Pate offers some reflections from reading John Walton’s The Lost World of the Torah.

    J. R. Miller also engaged with Walton’s work, with this paper presented at ETS: “Jesus in the Torah: A Response to John Walton’s Lost World Ethics.”

    The Bible Project’s blog begins a series on divine violence in Scripture with a post on the Noahic Flood: “Why Did God Flood the World?”

    Claude Mariottini ponders how Miriam’s role in leading Israel is portrayed and even downplayed in some passages: “The Leadership of Miriam.”

    Doug Chaplin at Liturgica has been busy this month posting summaries of the books of the Old Testament, focusing particularly on their use in the lectionary’s readings. Some of my favorites were this post musing on Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac, this one on the book of Leviticus, and his summary of Job.

    And Alex at Scribes of the Kingdom reflects on the fall of Satan/Babylon in Isaiah 14.


    New Testament Studies

    November was a bittersweet month in the world of New Testament scholarship. On the one hand, we saw some incredible new publications. On the other, we lost a fine scholar: Dr. Larry Hurtado concluded his long battle with cancer on November 25, 2019. One of his protégés, Michael J. Kruger, posted a heartfelt tribute to Dr. Hurtado here, and Christianity Today posted an obituary here.

    If you haven’t had the chance to read him, you should definitely start by checking out his books Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity and Destroyer of the gods: Early Christian Distinctiveness in the Roman World.

    With the final few posts on his blog this month, Dr. Hurtado highlighted some important but neglected studies on the apostle Paul that deserve more attention (“Paul and His Predecessors” and “Chronology Matters.”), and promoted a forthcoming article on Latin and Aramaic loanwords in the Gospel of Mark (“Linguistics and Loanwords in the Gospel of Mark”).

    Elsewhere in the blogosphere, Michael Bird has been busy reflecting on New Testament theology, with a series of posts including “Does the New Testament Really Have a Unifying Centre? Maybe, Maybe Not!” and “New Testament Theology OR History of Early Christianity?”

    Teaching on Jesus’ apocalyptic sermons, Ian Paul explains why being “left behind” is the better option — at least if we’re talking about what Jesus says in Matt 24:36-44!

    Scot McKnight draws attention to a new study on the meaning of pistis Christou in Paul’s writings, arguing that the “faithfulness of Christ” is demonstrated not just in his suffering and crucifixion but in the ongoing faithfulness of the risen and ascended Jesus toward believers: “The Faithfulness of Jesus Christ.”

    McKnight also wrote about why we should read Romans backwards, recommends Craig Keener’s new book on the genre and reliability of the Gospels, and lists some takeaways from Michael Gorman’s recent work on Pauline theology.

    Jay Smith offers a very helpful summary of the practice of “mirror-reading” and why it is necessary in studying New Testament epistles: “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Mirror-Reading Occasional Letters.”

    A former Dallas Seminary classmate of mine, Mikel Del Rosario (aka the Apologetics Guy), has a post on “Was Jesus Married?”

    You can see a survey of new research on the Pastoral Epistles from the SBL 2019 conference here, and from ETS 2019 here.

    Speaking of the Pastorals, Susan Hylen’s recent article on female deacons in 1 Tim 3:11 is worth checking out: “Hylen, ‘Women διάκονοι and Gendered Norms of Leadership’.”

    Phil Long over at Reading Acts has also been doing a series on the Pastorals this month — here’s one of my favorite posts, on the creedal formula in 1 Tim 3:14-16.

    Richard Beck ponders what 1 Peter 4:10 has to teach us about grace as a gift exchange.

    Over at Zondervan Academic, Loren Stuckenbruck tells us why we ought to read Revelation within the context of Second-Temple Jewish literature: “Reading Revelation in Context.”

    James Bradford Pate gave a fair-minded review of Bart Ehrman’s Jesus Before the Gospels.


    Theology & Ethics

    In light of the Thanksgiving holiday, it’s only appropriate to share Stephen Jordan’s reflection on how the experience of gratitude itself points us to God: “Gratitude, Thankfulness, and the Existence of God.”

    Ian Paul at Psephizo wrote an amazing piece about the nature of resurrection bodies and how that pertains to our understanding of sexuality, marriage, and procreation: “What does it mean to ‘be like the angels’ in Luke 20?”

    Marg Mowczko shares her insights from the past ten years of blogging on biblical equality between men and women — definitely worth a read! “What I’ve Learned from 10 Years of Blogging on Mutuality.”

    Some worthwhile pieces on political theology: David Justice at the Conciliar Post reflects on “Why We Still Need the Theology of Martin Luther King, Jr. Today,” and Michael Bird gives an outsider’s perspective on America’s political climate: “Jesus Isn’t Interested in America’s Two-Party Division.”

    Jackson Wu has more good thoughts on how we talk about atonement theories in “Is Penal Substitution a Western Doctrine?”

    Over at the Jesus Creed blog, this post suggests that most who struggle with the doctrine of hell are really struggling with the question of who will be saved. 

    Ben Witherington spends a ten-post series going through N. T. Wright’s History and Eschatology: Jesus and the Promise of Natural Theology (Part One here).

    Phil Long has a good review of David Instone-Brewer’s recent book on Moral Questions of the Bible.

    Apologist Haden Clark conducts a sober thought experiment in “What if I’m wrong?”

    Martin Davie sums up a recent collection of essays put forth by the Doctrine Commission of the Anglican Church of Australia on the subject of same-sex marriage.

    Dwight Gingrich also concludes a series on the topic of “Was Jesus Okay with Homosexuality?”

    Roger Olson reflects on the relationship between God and time (“Can God Change the Past? And What does that Have to Do with Open Theism?”), and articulates his understanding of God’s sovereignty and interaction with creation (“A Relational View of God’s Sovereignty”).

    And Kevin RK Davis does a great job clearing away some unfortunate misconceptions about Arminianism here.


    Newly Released Books

    Pride of place has to go to the recent juggernaut of a textbook from N. T. Wright and Michael Bird, The New Testament in Its World: An Introduction to the History, Literature, and Theology of the First Christians. Time will tell if this truly ends up being the “New Testament introduction of all New Testament introductions,” as Craig Keener lauds it, but it certainly does look impressive. And considering it’s a distillation of N. T. Wright’s voluminous and influential scholarship into a single user-friendly volume, it’ll no doubt be a useful resource.

    Scot McKnight and Nijay Gupta have compiled a handy-dandy survey of current New Testament scholarship in their The State of New Testament Studies: A Survey of Recent Research

    Also pertinent for New Testament studies is Myths and Mistakes in New Testament Textual Criticism, edited by Elijah Hixson and Peter J. Gurry. You can find a very helpful summary of key takeaways from the book here. Those interested in apologetics need to take note of the conclusions of this book when it comes to how we defend the reliability of the NT.

    Eugene Boring gives a practical work on Johannine theology in Hearing John’s Voice: Insights for Teaching and Preaching.

    Andrei Orlov’s new work examines the potential ramifications of some important Second-Temple Jewish beliefs on early Christology: The Glory of the Invisible God.

    J. Scott Duvall and J. Daniel Hays offer what looks like a worthwhile contribution to biblical theology in God’s Relational Presence: The Cohesive Center of Biblical Theology.

    Those interested in a comprehensive study on spiritual warfare should check out Spiritual Warfare in the Storyline of Scripture: A Biblical, Theological, and Practical Approach by William Cook and Chuck Lawless.

    Anyone active in Christian education will benefit from the reflections in Theology as a Way of Life: On Teaching and Learning the Christian Faith by Adam Neder.

    And history/sociology buffs will appreciate Evangelicals: Who They Have Been, Are Now, and Could Be by Mark A. Noll, David W. Bebbington, & George M. Marsden.

    Quite a few new commentaries released in November:


    Podcasts

    The fine folks at OnScript have some great interviews on tap this month, including:
    — Chris Tilling discusses the importance of Karl Barth’s reading of Romans (Part 1 | Part 2)
    — Josh McNall offers a mosaic approach to atonement theories (here).

    On Seminary Dropout, Shane Blackshear interviews N. T. Wright about his aforementioned new release, The New Testament in its World (here).

    On Help Me Teach the Bible, Nancy Guthrie and David Helm discuss how to teach the tragically much-neglected epistle of Jude (here).


    Text Criticism & Archaeology

    Brent Nongbri reports on the SBL panel conducting a “postmortem” on the fraudulent “First-Century Mark” manuscript here.

    Elijah Hixson suspects that there is another page to 093 that has gone unrecognized: “A Previously Unidentified Folio of 093?”

    Peter Head reports on a research project covering Codex Zacynthius: “Codex Zacynthius Study Day.”

    The Jerusalem Post covers the unveiling of a 1,000-year-old copy of the Pentateuch: “1,000-year-old Hebrew Bible revealed in Washington, D.C.”

    Leen Ritmeyer has a fascinating write-up on the site of ancient Shiloh — The Place Where the Tabernacle Stood.

    In this ASOR article, Collin Cornell examines evidence of goddess worship among Judeans living in Egypt. This cultural background might illumine texts like Jeremiah 44, which mention Jewish people worshiping a figure called the “Queen of Heaven.”

    The Biblical Archaeology Report sums up the results of archaeological research on Sergius Paulus, the proconsul mentioned in Acts 13 (here), and on Tiglath-Pileser III, the king of Assyria mentioned in 2 Kings 15 (here).


    Curiosities

    Take a walk on the weirder side of cultural background studies: Jim Davila reviews Michael Stone’s book, Secret Groups in Ancient Judaism (here). Stone argues that the Qumran community (which produced the Dead Sea Scrolls) is best understood within the sociological category of a “secret society.” His work also covers various other sectarian groups, keepers of esoteric knowledge, and magical practitioners active during the time the New Testament was written. Be sure to wear your hooded robes before entering.

    David Douherty reviews what looks like a fascinating book chronicling the history of the tumultuous relationship between Christians and rock music in America: “Review of The Devil’s Music by Randall J. Stephens.”

    And lastly, if you haven’t yet, I agree with Ben Witherington: You should go see the new film Knives Out


    And that concludes this month’s carnival! I hope you enjoyed your stroll through the biblical & theological studies midway. Don’t forget to swing by the gift shop, and please leave a like or a comment on your way out!

    Next month’s carnival will be at Alex’s Scribes of the Kingdom blog in January 2020. If you have a biblical studies blog and are interested in potentially hosting a future carnival, reach out to Phil Long (email: plong42@gmail.com or @plong42 on Twitter).

    And If I missed anything from last month that you think deserves mention, please put a link in the comments below!

    See you down the path.

  • Recommended Resources on Calvinism & Arminianism

    Recommended Resources on Calvinism & Arminianism

    Following up on my last post, I figured it would be good to give some recommend material for those who want to dig deeper into the topic of election/predestination, or into the debate between Calvinism and Arminianism in general.

    If you’ve been a Christian for any length of time, you’ve probably already given this subject some thought. And maybe you’ve even taken an stance on it – whether Calvinist, Arminian, or something else altogether!

    But whether you’ve settled on a position or you’re just now setting out into these deep waters, it’s good to consider each side of the debate. To help with that, here are a few books that I’ve found to be the most helpful. Each of these has had an impact on my own thinking — even the ones where I disagreed with the author’s conclusions. They’ve helped me to clarify my own position and challenged me to keep exploring Scripture.

    Along that same line, I want to issue a personal challenge to you, dear reader: If you already identify with a particular position, read a work arguing for the other side! 

    Two reasons I encourage this. Firstly, it’s important that you hear the best arguments your opponents have to offer, out of respect for them. Make sure you really know what it is you disagree with. And secondly, seeing that other Christians have logical reasons for their views helps keep you humble. It fosters greater unity when you can at least understand where folks of different theological persuasions are coming from.

    Without further ado, here are my top recommended resources on election/predestination!

     

    Chosen By God by R. C. Sproul

    Sproul’s short book is a classic primer on the Calvinist understanding of election (that God unconditionally elects individuals to salvation or damnation). It’s concise, thorough, and readable. Even though it’s the one on this list that I find the most disagreement with (for example, at one point he implies that Calvinism is the only truly Protestant view, which is very much incorrect), it’s still worth reading to get a quick introduction to and defense of Calvinism.

     

    hand in Hand: The Beauty of God’s Sovereignty and Meaningful Human Choice by Randy Alcorn.

    Alcorn’s book is a great example of moderate Calvinism, and he goes more in-depth than Sproul in his discussion of how God’s providence intersects with human choice from a compatibilist perspective. Alcorn examines a great number of Scripture passages, while also covering the philosophical elements, all without getting overly technical. What I appreciate most is Alcorn’s tone – he’s a great example of how to defend your view with fairness and charity. Also, his first chapter gives some fantastic perspective on the Calvinist/Arminian debate as a whole.

     

    Against Calvinism: Rescuing God’s Reputation from Radical Reformed Theology by Roger Olson.

    I think Olson’s book is one that every Christian should read at least once, whether you end up agreeing with him or not. The reason it’s so good is that he begins by defining and explaining Calvinism thoroughly before he explains why he disagrees with it, so you’ll get clear definitions of both sides. It’s a great model for how debate should happen. Olson never sets up straw-man arguments – he extensively quotes the best exponents of Calvinism, articulates clearly the challenges to their views, and provides a well-written and passionate case for Arminianism. 

     

    Grace, Faith, Free Will by Robert Picirilli.

    Just as Sproul’s Chosen by God is a good primer on Calvinism, Picirilli’s book is an excellent introduction to classical Arminian thought. He defends the view that election is tied to God’s foreknowledge of people’s faith-decision. Picirilli also covers a great deal of Scripture, although with certain Bible passages his book could have benefitted from more extensive exegesis and discussion.

     

    The New Chosen People (Revised & Expanded Edition): A Corporate View of Election by William Klein.

    Klein’s work is probably the best modern treatment of the corporate view of election. He examines Scripture in-depth to argue that election is far more about group identity than about an individual’s personal destiny. If that idea alone sounds new to you, you need to pick up Klein’s book! He explores the Old Testament, intertestamental Jewish literature, and the New Testament, and his coverage of “election” terminology in Scripture is itself worth the price of the book.

     

    The Chosen People: Election, Paul, and Second Temple Judaism by A. Chadwick Thornhill.

    I add this as a bonus, as it also supports the corporate view of election and complements Klein’s book nicely. Where Thornhill’s book differs from Klein’s is that it focuses more attention on what Jewish thinkers were saying about election and predestination in the days shortly before the New Testament was written. In other words, you’ll learn more about how the apostle Paul and other New Testament writers were joining a conversation that was already underway. You’ll get deeper background on how the imagery of election and predestination was being understood in the first century, and learn how Scripture develops that conversation. 

     

    I hope you’ll read at least one (if not more) of these, and that they’ll help sharpen your thinking on this controversial and challenging topic!

    Let me know what you think! Have I left out any of your favorites? Drop me a comment!

    See you down the path.